Skip to main content

Khruschev's Relationship With Other Soviet Leaders

In March of 1953, Joseph Stalin, premier of the Soviet Union, died suddenly leaving an

enormous power vacuum at the center of Soviet leadership. While Nikita Khruschev would

eventually be his long-standing successor, the transition of power was neither linear nor smooth.

Khruschev strategically allied himself with key members of the soviet presidium, including Giorgi

Malenkov, chairman of the presidium, and Georgy Zhukov, Marshal of the Red Army, to oust (and even

sometimes execute) members whom he felt posed a threat. Over the next 5 years, through his cunning

he brought himself from the bottom of the council of ministers to the premier of the Soviet Union,

usurping power from Malenkov and demoting Zhukov and bringing his allies to the center of power of

the USSR ("Leadership of the Soviet Union"). By the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis, Khruschev was

the unchallenged and feared leader of the USSR, and his rise to power ensured that most within the

Soviet leadership would not dare cross him.

Because of the nature of Khruschev's ascension to premier, the leadership was made up of

those whom he considered his allies. The leadership had to tread lightly to ensure that what happened

to many of their predecessors didn't happen to them. Khruschev chose his allies carefully, including

Anastas Mikoyan, Alexei Kosygin, Leonid Brezhnev, Nikolai Podgorny, and Frol Kozlov. These

members within the leadership were most outwardly loyal, and were few to gain Khruschev's trust.

Notably, Frol Kozlov was designated Khruschev's successor and one of few who was briefed before

the placement of nuclear weapons in Cuba (Foreign Relations of the United States), while Alexei

Kosygin and Leonid Brezhnev ascended to their positions of Minister of Foreign Affairs and Chairman

of the Presidium through their outspoken support of Khruschev ("Leonid Brezhnev").

Not all within leadership agreed with all of Khruschev's policies, however. Khuschev's advisor

and deputy premier, Anastas Mikoyan, disliked the idea of sending nuclear weapons to Cuba

("Dramatis Personae"). Rodion Malinovksy, Minister of Defense, sought to expand the military in direct

opposition to Khruschev's goal to limit it in favor of nuclear weapons. Mikhail Suslov's strong hatred of

the West made him strongly disagree with Khruschev's policies of peaceful coexistence and

destalinization, making him one of few with such beliefs to make it to the presidium ("The Foreign

Policy Views of Mikhail Suslov). These members remained in power because Khruschev saw value in

their abilities to strengthen the USSR which outweighed their dissent to his policies, but pushing too far

could see them suffering similar fate to those who challenged Khruschev in the past.

Some members within the Presidium were notably power-hungry, and some more so than they

were loyal to Khruschev. For example, Brezhnev and Podgorny were engaged in a power struggle

throughout their time in the presidium which could often put one by Khruschev's side and the other

against ("The Policy Views of Nikolai Podgorny"). Khruschev was a keen and sharp premier who could

sniff out and effectively prepare against attempts to usurp him, and will not easily be taken down by

any power-hungry members of the leadership.


    Sources:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikita_Khrushchev


    https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v05/d25  


   https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/files/CMC50/


    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leonid-Ilich-Brezhnev


    http://www.cubanmissilecrisis.org/background/dramatis-personae/ussr/


    "The Foreign Policy Views of Mikhail Suslov." Central Intelligence Agency, 1978


    "The Foreign Policy Views of Nikolai Podgorny." Central Intelligence Agency, June 1977

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mathilde McKeever Introduction

 Hi everyone! I'm Mathilde and will be one of your vice-chairs for the USSR cabinet!  This will be my third year in BMUN, and my 6th year doing Model UN overall. Crisis committees have always been my favorite, and I'm super excited to see what ideas you all bring to conference this year, as well as where the US, the USSR and Cuba will end up by the end of committee (hopefully still in existence!) I went to high school in Albany CA, right next to Berkeley, but I'm originally from Nova Scotia, Canada and I often find myself missing seasons changing (also Tim Hortons). At Cal, I'm a junior studying Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. In my free time, I love to swim, hike, and explore campus - though unfortunately these days I don't go as often. I also love traveling, especially to places that have either snow or castles - bonus points if the place has both! I'm looking forward to conference this year, and I hope you are all as well! Please don't hesita...

Involvement in Proxy Wars and the Role of Public Opinion

         The Cold War was marred by proxy wars. Modern-day Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, and others are defined by Soviet and American intervention over the course of the 20th century. As of the start of this committee, the Korean was is a decade old and over, and the Vietnam War is being fought without American and Soviet ground troops, and conflict in Afghanistan is not on anyone's minds. Korean War: The Korean War broke out in 1950 as the USSR armed North Korean communist insurgents in an effort to install communist rule throughout the Korean Peninsula. While these forces did manage to break through the 38th parallel, they were soon driven back by UN forces led by the United States. These forces formed a peace at the 38th parallel years after fighting. After the conclusion of the last battle of the war, neither side felt truly victorious. On the American side, they had managed to repel the Communist forces back to territory that was divided at the end of the S...